by John Clay and Rachel Vilsack
December 2013
Download this article in PDF
The Minnesota Legislature debated raising the state minimum wage in the 2013 legislative session. Because wage level differences in House and Senate bills remained unresolved as the session closed, the Legislature is expected to revisit the issue when the session resumes in February 2014. This raises the question: How many jobs, in which regions, and in which occupations, would be affected if there were a substantial increase in the state minimum wage? To find the answer, we take the higher minimum wage level of the House bill (HF0092), $9.50 an hour for large employers, and estimate how many jobs would see wages increase to meet the new level.
Minnesota's minimum wage currently stands at $6.15 an hour for large employers, defined as those with gross annual revenue of $625,000 or more, which is below the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. According to federal law, any employer, for-profit or nonprofit, with annual gross revenue of $500,000 or more that engages in interstate commerce - by taking credit cards or using out-of-state suppliers, for example - must pay the federal minimum wage whenever it is higher than the state minimum as is the case today. The higher wage also prevails for any employee who engages in interstate commerce in a given week in the performance of their job, regardless of the amount of the employer's annual gross revenue.
Thus, $7.25 an hour is the minimum wage the vast majority of Minnesota employers must pay. So few businesses fall outside of the federal coverage that the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, which administers minimum wage laws, describes $7.25 as the effective minimum wage in Minnesota. For the purpose of our analysis here, we do not include jobs that pay below $7.25 an hour in the count of jobs which would be affected by the proposed $9.50 an hour minimum wage.
If the federal minimum wage had kept pace with inflation since 1968, it would today be $10.75 an hour according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' CPI Inflation Calculator. The difference between the hypothetical inflation-adjusted federal wage of $10.75 an hour and the actual effective wage of $7.25 demonstrates a loss of consumer purchasing power, making it harder for people with jobs to make ends meet.
Several states have set their minimum wages well above the federal rate. California will raise its minimum wage to $10.00 an hour in 2016, while the state of Washington raised its minimum wage to $9.19 an hour and pegged it to rise with inflation. Oregon's wage of $8.95 an hour, also pegged to inflation, will easily surpass $9.00 an hour by 2015, and Connecticut's wage will be $9.00 an hour in 2015.
A special analysis of Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) program data provides insight into the estimated number of jobs in Minnesota, by region and by occupation, that pay under $9.50 an hour and therefore would be affected by the increase. Wages reported by employers to the OES program should include straight-time gross pay, which includes incentive pay, both commissions and production bonuses, and tips.1 Further, employment estimates include non-farm, full- or part-time paid workers, paid owners, officers, and staff of incorporated firms covered by the state's Unemployment Insurance (UI) program.2
Overall, 387,710 jobs in Minnesota, or 14.7 percent of total occupational employment, paid under $9.50 an hour during first quarter 2013 based on the OES employment and wage estimates. This percentage varies by region as seen in Figure 1. The Twin Cities Metro (12.5 percent) and Southeast (16.3 percent) regions had the lowest percentage of jobs paying less than $9.50 an hour, while Northeast (19.8 percent) and Southwest (19.7 percent) had the highest percentage of jobs that would be impacted by an increase in the minimum wage.
Our OES analysis is a count of jobs, not people. In some cases one person may hold multiple jobs. Wage records collected by the UI program could also be used to analyze the percent of jobs paying under $9.50 by region, firm size, and industry and may yield different results than are presented here. The December 2013 edition of Minnesota Economic Trends includes such an article.
One advantage to using OES to estimate jobs that could be impacted by a minimum wage increase is the ability to look at the data at an occupation level. Regional occupational distributions can also account for the differences in the percentages of jobs paying less than $9.50 an hour. Table 1 shows the estimated number and percent of jobs with a wage of less than $9.50 by occupational grouping. Food preparation and serving related occupations accounted for the largest number of jobs with a wage under $9.50, with almost 60 percent of these jobs in the Twin Cities Metro and just over 70 percent of jobs in Northeast Minnesota paying less than this amount. Depending on the region 25 to 33 percent of jobs in sales and related occupations also pay less than $9.50. In addition to these groupings, other service-providing jobs like building and maintenance and personal care and service would be most affected by an increase in the minimum wage to $9.50. On the other hand, an increase in the minimum wage to $9.50 would impact a small number of jobs in several occupational groups, including architectural and engineering, computer and mathematical, and legal.
| Table 1: Estimated Number of Jobs Paying Under $9.50 in Minnesota by Occupational Group and Region | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupation Code | Occupation Title | Minnesota | Central | Metro | Northeast | Northwest | Southeast | Southwest | |||||||
| Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | Number Paying; $9.50 | Percent Paying; $9.50 | ||
| 11-0000 | Management | 961 | 0.6% | 141 | 1.3% | 318 | 0.3% | 90 | 1.4% | 146 | 1.6% | 128 | 1.2% | 136 | 1.8% |
| 13-0000 | Business and Financial Operations | 1,185 | 0.8% | 120 | 1.6% | 397 | 0.4% | 81 | 1.8% | 107 | 1.7% | 141 | 1.8% | 337 | 6.2% |
| 15-0000 | Computer and Mathematical | 213 | 0.3% | 67 | 2.6% | 92 | 0.1% | 12 | 0.6% | 19 | 1.0% | 20 | 0.3% | 5 | 1.0% |
| 17-0000 | Architecture and Engineering | 16 | 0.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 6 | 0.0% | ;5 | 1.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 19-0000 | Life, Physical, and Social Science | 149 | 0.6% | 5 | 1.0% | 38 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 81 | 3.9% | 22 | 1.6% |
| 21-0000 | Community and Social Services | 1,596 | 3.2% | 186 | 3.3% | 398 | 1.4% | 370 | 7.6% | 303 | 6.8% | 184 | 4.7% | 152 | 4.5% |
| 23-0000 | Legal | 51 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 7 | 1.4% | 40 | 5.1% | 5 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 25-0000 | Education, Training, and Library | 10,223 | 6.7% | 506 | 2.7% | 6,230 | 7.3% | 368 | 4.4% | 744 | 4.8% | 1,556 | 11.2% | 813 | 7.5% |
| 27-0000 | Arts, Design, Entertainment, and Media | 4,054 | 10.6% | 281 | 16.3% | 2,365 | 8.1% | 199 | 14.5% | 214 | 11.2% | 679 | 25.0% | 260 | 18.6% |
| 29-0000 | Healthcare Practitioners and Technical | 1,027 | 0.7% | 95 | 0.6% | 317 | 0.4% | 161 | 1.5% | 78 | 0.6% | 203 | 0.9% | 169 | 1.8% |
| 31-0000 | Healthcare Support | 7,582 | 8.1% | 1,285 | 10.7% | 1,818 | 4.0% | 1,062 | 15.2% | 1,099 | 11.8% | 871 | 8.2% | 1,416 | 15.6% |
| 33-0000 | Protective Service | 3,406 | 8.1% | 304 | 7.7% | 1,395 | 5.5% | 346 | 10.9% | 713 | 20.0% | 296 | 8.6% | 342 | 14.7% |
| 35-0000 | Food Preparation and Serving Related | 140,545 | 62.9% | 14,372 | 66.5% | 77,984 | 59.6% | 10,316 | 70.4% | 13,819 | 66.6% | 12,011 | 65.9% | 11,898 | 69.8% |
| 37-0000 | Building , Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance | 22,240 | 27.5% | 2,486 | 28.9% | 10,397 | 24.0% | 2,041 | 36.7% | 2,747 | 31.8% | 2,400 | 28.5% | 1,822 | 35.1% |
| 39-0000 | Personal Care and Service | 28,059 | 26.7% | 3,974 | 35.2% | 13,907 | 21.4% | 2,289 | 37.1% | 3,689 | 43.8% | 1,937 | 28.7% | 2,225 | 30.4% |
| 41-0000 | Sales and Related | 83,582 | 30.8% | 9,579 | 37.9% | 45,000 | 25.8% | 5,553 | 42.8% | 8,000 | 39.1% | 8,358 | 40.2% | 6,928 | 42.4% |
| 43-0000 | Office and Administrative Support | 35,602 | 8.9% | 4,340 | 12.3% | 16,659 | 6.4% | 2,651 | 13.6% | 4,402 | 15.3% | 3,833 | 12.2% | 3,591 | 15.4% |
| 45-0000 | Farming, Fishing, and Forestry | 674 | 20.9% | 148 | 30.5% | 145 | 26.4% | 5 | 2.0% | 175 | 27.3% | 79 | 17.4% | 123 | 14.9% |
| 47-0000 | Construction and Extraction | 1,211 | 1.5% | 139 | 1.2% | 595 | 1.5% | 93 | 1.5% | 191 | 2.2% | 56 | 0.8% | 63 | 1.0% |
| 49-0000 | Installation, Maintenance, and Repair | 3,094 | 3.5% | 389 | 4.1% | 1,528 | 3.2% | 166 | 2.5% | 268 | 3.2% | 340 | 3.9% | 399 | 5.4% |
| 51-0000 | Production | 19,099 | 8.9% | 2,027 | 7.5% | 12,253 | 10.6% | 758 | 9.9% | 1,256 | 6.6% | 1,167 | 5.1% | 1,549 | 7.2% |
| 53-0000 | Transportation and Material Moving | 25,188 | 15.6% | 3,306 | 18.1% | 12,828 | 14.4% | 1,389 | 17.6% | 2,501 | 17.6% | 2,955 | 19.3% | 2,095 | 16.1% |
| 00-0000 | Total, All Occupations | 387,711 | 14.7% | 43,565 | 17.2% | 203,692 | 12.5% | 27,775 | 19.8% | 40,267 | 19.4% | 37,127 | 16.3% | 34,089 | 19.7% |
| Source: DEED, Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) | |||||||||||||||
Following are the 10 occupations with the largest percentage of jobs paying under $9.50 an hour in Minnesota. Many are in the food service industry:
Several of these occupations - waiters and waitresses, baggage porters and bartenders - usually receive tips. Employers participating in the OES program are asked to include tips in their hourly wage calculations. Currently Minnesota employers cannot take a tip credit against state- or federal-set minimum wages, meaning that employees must be paid the minimum wage as a reliable base rate independent of the variability of tips.
In addition to the wages of currently employed workers, the wages for open positions will also be impacted if the state's minimum wage increases to $9.50 an hour. Another method of assessing the impact of an increase in the minimum wage is to look at the wages of current job openings across Minnesota, as captured by the semi-annual Job Vacancy Survey (JVS). Table 2 shows the high-end percentage of job openings during second quarter 2013 that had a median wage of $9.50 or less by region.3 A distinction is made between full-time and part-time openings since full-time positions are more likely to offer wages above $9.50 an hour. Just 6.4 percent of full-time job vacancies offered a median wage of less than $9.50 compared to 61.6 percent of part-time openings in Minnesota. Forty-five percent of all job vacancies in Minnesota are part-time.
The concentration varies by region as the Northwest region had a substantially higher percentage of full-time job openings offering less than $9.50. This situation likely correlates to the region's higher concentration of temporary or seasonal job vacancies during second quarter 2013.4
| Table 2: Percentage of Job Openings Paying $9.50 or Less, 2Q 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Region | Full-Time Openings | Part-Time Openings |
| Central | 3.5% | 59.0 |
| Northeast | 10.9% | 79.2 |
| Northwest | 48.0% | 78.5 |
| Metro | 4.9% | 69.0 |
| Southeast | 6.8% | 58.8 |
| Southwest | 10.9% | 87.1 |
| Statewide | 6.4% | 61.6 |
| Source: DEED, Job Vacancy Survey | ||
The exact number of jobs that would be affected by a proposed $9.50 an hour minimum wage might not be known, but the increase could be expected to have varying impacts across regions and occupations as suggested by these estimates. Some median wage offers captured by the JVS also would rise, particularly among the 45 percent of Minnesota job openings that are part-time. Part-time job seekers, particularly in food service and sales occupations, will see an increase in their hourly wage offers.
Additional analysis would be required to estimate the effect of the proposed minimum wage increase on consumer spending power in Minnesota, the effect on individuals and families who depend either fully or partly on minimum wage incomes, and the channels of adjustment employers would likely use to absorb the increased wage bill. Understanding the number and share of affected jobs and job openings is an important first step toward helping communities and their representatives make informed choices in the coming legislative session.
1Excluded from the wage definition are overtime pay, shift differentials, non-production bonuses, holiday pay, meal and lodging payments, draw, severance pay, back pay, jury duty pay, and tuition reimbursements.
2Excluded from the employment definition are proprietors of unincorporated firms, other self-employed and contract workers, unpaid family workers, and workers on unpaid leave.
3The percentages displayed in this analysis include occupations for which data were disclosable and where the median wage was $9.50 or less.
4Economic Development Regions (EDR) 4 and 5 in Northwest Minnesota have a higher than average percentage of full-time job openings also classified as temporary or seasonal. These jobs overwhelmingly appear in the building, grounds cleaning and maintenance, and transportation and material moving occupations.
